SEMESTER WISE SELF ALLOTMENT OF PROJECTS
[ Approved By AICTE / Director General of Civil Aviation, Affiliated to RTU & BTU ]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR STUDENTS
INTRODUCTION
The quality of technical education depends on various factors; outcome based socially and industrially relevant curriculum, good quality motivated faculty, teaching learning process, industry internships, evaluation of students based on desired outcomes among others.
Semester Project / Mini Project / Major Project assessment will be done on a continuous basis as given below
S.No. |
Review / Examination Scheme |
Weightage |
1. |
First Review |
20 Marks For Semester / 25 Marks For Major |
2. |
Second Review |
25 Marks For Semester / 85 Marks For Major |
3. |
Third Review |
25 Marks For Semester / 100 Marks For Major |
4. |
Project Report and Viva – Voce |
35 Marks For Semester / 140 Marks For Major |
For the project and Viva – Voce end semester examination, the student shall submit a Project Report in the prescribed format issued by the Institute. The first three reviews will be conducted by a Committee constituted by the Head of the Department. The end semester assessment will be based on the final project (working project), project report and a viva on the project conducted by a Committee constituted by the Director. This may include an external expert.
TABLE 9.5 - SEMESTER PROJECT ASSESSMENT DETAILS |
Serial Number |
Type of Review |
Parameters |
Marks |
|
1. |
1. |
Literature Search & Feasibility |
5 |
20 |
Problem Statement & Budget Analysis |
5 |
E Link |
5 |
Reference Books |
5 |
2. |
2. |
Usefulness to Society or Environment |
3 |
25 |
Compliance to Standards / Norms |
4 |
Project Scheduling & Work Delegation (here work delegation is for group project only) |
5 |
Identification of Essential Concepts |
6 |
Equipment / Component List |
7 |
3. |
3. |
Effective Utilization of the Modern Tools |
3 |
20 |
Design (s) |
5 |
Construction / Manufacturing of project. Analyse the Results (Software / Theoretical / Practical) |
12 |
4. |
4. |
Project Report and Submission of Working Model |
11 |
35 |
Oral Presentation |
9 |
Video / PPT Presentation |
5 |
Viva Voce (Technical Knowledge) |
5 |
Performance in the Team |
5 |
TOTAL MARKS |
100 |
100 |
TABLE 9.10 - MAJOR PROJECT ASSESSMENT DETAILS |
Serial Number |
Type of Review |
Parameters |
Marks |
|
1. |
1. |
Literature Search & Feasibility |
4 |
25 |
Problem Statement & Budget Analysis (estimate) |
5 |
Usefulness to Society or Environment |
2 |
Compliance to Standards / Norms |
1 |
Project Scheduling & Work Delegation (here work delegation is for group project only) |
2 |
Identification of Essential Concepts |
4 |
Equipment / Component List |
3 |
E Link |
2 |
Reference Books |
2 |
2. |
2. |
Effective Utilization of the Modern Tools |
10 |
85 |
Design (s) |
30 |
Analyse the Results (Software / Theoretical Analysis) |
30 |
Exact Budget Analysis of Major Project (Prototype) |
15 |
3. |
3. |
Prototype / Working Model (Physical Model Only) |
50 |
100 |
Experimental Analysis |
25 |
Comparison of Theoretical (Software) and Practical (Experimental Readings) |
25 |
4. |
4. |
Project Report and Final Submission of Working Model to College |
50 |
140 |
Poster Presentation |
10 |
Originality Score |
30 |
Oral Presentation |
20 |
Video / PPT Presentation |
10 |
Viva Voce (Technical Knowledge) |
10 |
Performance in the Team |
10 |
TOTAL MARKS |
350 |
350 |
e BOOKS & REFERENCE BOOKS
Reference books and e-books play a great role, when student studies particular subject. Student when he starts studying a particular course / subject is not aware of the books from where he can study full theoritical and practical details of project and for his further readings. Faculties are required to mention his / her suggested course and reference book for the project. There should be at least two course books and reference books.
For self allotment of project by students, they are suppose to mention the e books and reference book details, which they will use for making the project.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES
Objective — A project objective describes what a faculty member expects from a student after successful complition of project. They are generally less broader than desirable goals and more broader than student learning outcomes.
Outcome — A detailed description of what a student must be able to do at the conclusion of a project. We generally map the objective to the outcomes to analyze and document their attainment. An objective is more like a plan, or a road map to reach/attain the outcomes.
NOTE
In final project outcome, points with star markings are applicable for semester projects, where as all the points are applicable for mini (Sem 7) and major projects (Sem 8) of the students.
For students of semester 8, if you want to take forward your minor project as major project, you need to give details of minor project current status and marks scored in minor project in separate fields given below.
CROSS BATCH GROUP PROJECTS ARE NOT ALLOWED
- FOR SEMESTER 8 STUDENTS, ONE FACULTY CAN GUIDE MAX OF TWO GROUPS ONLY. FACULTY MEMBERS ARE ALSO REQUESTED TO MAKE A NOTE OF IT.
- STUDENTS ARE REQUESTED TO GO THROUGH ABOVE DETAILS VERY THOROUGHLY BEFORE STARTING THE SELF ALLOTMENT OF PROJECTS FOR THE SEMESTER
- MAXIMUM STRENGHT ALLOWED IN GROUP PROJECT IS 6, INCLUDING GROUP LEADER
- SINCE STUDENTS ARE PREFERING THERE OWN PROJECTS FOR SEMESTER SUBJECTS TOO,
WE HAVE NOT UPDATED THE LIST OF SEMESTER SUBJECT PROJECTS.
- 30 % ARE PROJECT MARKS OUT OF THE TOTAL OF PRACTICAL SUBJECT MARKS
- AS PER NEW SYLLABUS THERE IS NO MINOR PROJECT FOR SEMESTER 7, BUT STUDENTS ARE REQUIRED TO CHOOSE PROJECTS FOR SPECIAL PRACTICALS TOO.
- STUDENTS OF ALL SEMESTERS ARE REQUIRED TO DO SELF ALLOTMENT OF PROJECTS FOR SPECIAL PRACTICALS TOO.